The admitted evidence of Serbian atrocities in Bosnia makes the International Court of Justice ruling self-contradictory, insists Martin Shaw. Go to Open Democracy for the full text.
Category: genocide
Genocide: rethinking the concept, Open Democracy, 1 February 2007
An understanding of the term "genocide" that draws afresh on the experience of the last century is needed to ensure greater human security in the next, says Martin Shaw. Go to Open Democracy for the full text.
Israeli minister threatens Gaza ‘Holocaust’ – what will the International Association of Genocide Scholars say?
'Israel's deputy defence minister yesterday warned his country was close to launching a huge military operation in Gaza and said Palestinians would bring on themselves a "bigger shoah," using the Hebrew word usually reserved for the Holocaust. The choice of vocabulary from Matan Vilnai, an often outspoken former army general, was unusually grave - the… Continue reading Israeli minister threatens Gaza ‘Holocaust’ – what will the International Association of Genocide Scholars say?
Denying the Bosnian genocide: the ICJ judgement
Letter to The Guardian, published in a slightly edited version, 28 February 2007The International Court of Justice judgement on Serbia's role in Bosnia is narrow, conservative and ultimately perverse. Sticking to the findings of the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia, the Court rules that only the Srebrenica massacre was genocide. Thus the judges isolated… Continue reading Denying the Bosnian genocide: the ICJ judgement
Martin Shaw 